GAO Releases Report on Student Loan Mismanagement in Response to Request of then-Ranking Member Cassidy and then-Chairwoman Foxx
On August 6, 2026, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report, titled, “Federal Student Loans: Education Could Better Coordinate with Servicers When Making Program Changes,” (GAO-26-107780), in response to a request form then-Ranking Member Cassidy and then-Chairwoman Foxx, which details how the Biden-Harris Department of Education left loan servicers in chaos. GAO was asked to review the Department’s instruction to loan servicers because as of September 2025, the Department held over $1.6 trillion in outstanding federal student loans and significant changes were made during the Biden-Harris Administration to the loan programs, which added new complexities to loan servicers’ responsibilities.
GAO found that loan servicers faced challenges implementing program changes due to a lack of upfront instruction from the Department of Education. All four loan servicers surveyed raised concerns about the number of clarifying questions they needed answered to implement some requested changes. GAO found that the lack of clear, up-front instruction sometimes resulted in extensive back-and-forth between the Department and the loan servicers.
GAO recommended that the Department develop and implement criteria for determining when to conduct early coordination with loan servicers. The Department disagreed with GAO’s recommendation, stating that such criteria would hinder its ability to implement changes in a timely and efficient manner while being responsive to administration priorities. In December 2025, the Department also told GAO that early coordination with servicers has also significantly improved.
“Instead of fulfilling their duties as Congress intended, the Biden-Harris administration dramatically increased the scope of its student loan program and misled borrowers into thinking their debt would be cancelled,” said Dr. Cassidy. “Thanks to the Working Families Tax Cuts, Republicans are helping students get out of the cycle of debt Democrats put them in. We must continue to work with the Trump administration to strengthen accountability to our loan program so students have the best chance to succeed.”
“The Biden-Harris administration prioritized unlawful student loan bailouts over the basic responsibility of administering the federal student loan program,” said Chairman Walberg. “By diverting critical staff and resources, Biden-Harris threw borrowers and servicers into total chaos. Students and taxpayers deserve a system that is transparent, accountable, and functions—not one plagued by mismanagement and confusion. We applaud the Trump administration’s efforts to restore coordination with servicers and restore accountability to the federal student loan program.”
Senate Passes Continuing Resolution Before Breaking for Extended Recess
On August 8, 2026, the Senate passed a continuing resolution (CR) by a vote of 90-6 to fund the federal government at existing FY 2026 spending levels through December 11, 2026. In July, the House passed a CR that would fund federal agencies through December 4, 2026, including the Department of Education, at their current FY 2026 spending levels. The Senate and House will need to reconcile the chambers’ proposals once they return from recess.
Senate HELP Committee Passes Several Higher Education Bills
On July 30, 2026, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee passed several bills, including several related to higher education. The College Transparency Act (S. 2511) was reintroduced by Senators Bill Cassidy (R-LA), Chair of the HELP Committee, and Elizabeth Warren (D-MA), and would create a postsecondary student data system that would evaluate student enrollment patterns, progression, completion, and postsecondary outcomes, along with higher education costs and financial aid for educational institutions. This data system would provide increased transparency of college costs and would help students and families make more informed decisions about a postsecondary education. The Committee voted 21-1 in favor of the bill.
The HELP Committee also considered S. 5046, a bill that would prohibit the transfer of certain offices, including the Office of Postsecondary Education (OPE), from the Department of Education to other federal agencies. The bill passed by a vote of 13-9. An amendment to S. 5046, offered by Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), which would prohibit ED from transferring Federal Student Aid (FSA) to other agencies, was rejected.
S. 4097, the State-Based Loan Awareness Act, advanced by a vote of 20-2, would exclude certain state-based education loan programs from preferred lender list requirements.
House Democrats Host Panel to Discuss the Trump Administration’s Efforts to Change the Student Loan System
On July 23, 2026, Ranking Member of the House Education and Workforce Committee, Bobby Scott (D-VA), hosted a panel of student loan experts to discuss the impact of the Trump Administration’s efforts to change the student loan system as a result of the enactment of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). Previously, on May 11, 2026, Ranking Member Scott and Congresswoman Alma Adams (D-NC) sent a letter to Chairman of the House Education and Workforce Committee Tim Walberg (R-MI) requesting an oversight hearing with Federal Student Aid (FSA) on its ability to serve students and borrowers. According to Ranking Member Scott, no response was received.
Ranking Member Scott began the panel discussion by expressing his concern regarding the Department of Education’s plan to transfer key student aid functions to the Department of Treasury, which has no expertise on how to serve students or institutions of higher education. “Compounding the issues that have arisen from the dismantling of the Education Department are the sweeping changes to the student loan program, which Republicans passed in the “Big Ugly Bill” through the elimination of the Grad PLUS loans and the enactment of new loan limits and repayment plans.”
The panel members discussed their concerns, particularly their concerns about the definition of professional students, which will restrict loan access to many students.
House Education and Workforce Committee Passes Bills to Break Up the Department of Education
On July 16, 2026, the House Education and Workforce Committee passed a 10-bill package that would partially fulfill President Trump’s goal of breaking up the Department of Education. The bills codify the various interagency agreements the Department has entered into to move the administration of certain programs to other federal agencies, including the Departments of Labor and Treasury.
House Education Committee Chairman Tim Walberg (R-MI) called the creation of the Department of Education in 1979 by President Jimmy Carter a “politically motivated mistake,” and said:
“For too long, Washington has accepted outcomes that should be unacceptable. Too many children can’t read or do math at grade level. Too many students leave college without a degree or the skills they need to succeed. And the federal government has mismanaged a $1.7 trillion student loan portfolio, leaving more than 9 million borrowers in default. The question before the Committee today was simple: do we defend the bureaucracy that produced those results, or do we pursue reforms that put students, families, and workers first? Committee Republicans chose reform because we believe every American deserves the opportunity to succeed.”
House Education Committee Ranking Member Bobby Scott (D-VA) said:
“Mr. Chairman, it must be emphasized that none of those other departments have anywhere close to the same expertise in serving students or administering education programs as the Department of Education. Overall, these proposals would move or eliminate programs within the Offices of Elementary and Secondary Education, Postsecondary Education, Indian Education, Career, Technical and Adult Education, and the Federal Student Aid Office.”
“Mr. Chairman, it is difficult to articulate how impractical these proposals are, to say nothing of the pain and suffering they will inflict on students, educators, and their communities if they were to become law. So, whatever you say about the ‘problems’ at the Department of Education, these bills will only make things worse.”
Two of the 10 bills are related to postsecondary education: H.R. 9609, Less Bureaucracy, Better Student Aid Act, which passed by a 19-16 party-line vote, and H.R. 9611, Less Bureaucracy, Better Higher Education Act, which passed by a 20-16 party-line vote. H.R. 9609 would transfer several federal student aid programs to the Department of Treasury: the Pell Grant program, Federal Work-Study, and student loan servicing and debt collection. H.R. 9611 would transfer the function of certain postsecondary education programs to the Department of Labor, including the management of federal TRIO programs and the Strengthening Institutions programs.
Secretary of Education issued a statement praising the House Committee for passing the bills: “Today marks a major step by Congressional leaders to cement the Trump Administration’s historic reforms to right-size the federal role in education. For decades, the Department of Education has been a failed experiment – a $3 trillion bureaucracy that has resulted in declining test scores, ballooning student debt, and misalignment between education programs and workforce demands.”
DHS Moves to Restrict How Long International Students Can Stay in U.S.
On July 17, 2026, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a Final Rule in the Federal Register, amending its regulations to change the admission period in the F, J. and I classifications from duration of status to an admission for a fixed period. The updated rule eliminates “duration of status” on student visas, which allowed foreigners to stay in the United States as long as they continued to be full-time students, and replaces it with fixed end dates. The effective date is September 15, 2026.
- Student visas will now last for four years or for the duration of the degree program, whichever is shorter, whether they are undergraduates, master’s students, or doctoral students.
- Students who would like to remain in the United States any longer will require specific approval from DHS by filing an application for a Formal Extension of Stay (EOS) before their Admit Until Date (AUD). Individuals filing for an EOS must ensure they meet the rule’s extension eligibility requirements, including demonstrating “compelling” circumstances that justify the stay.
- Both new student visa holders and existing ones will be subject to a strict timeframe. Students, who are already in the United States and who were not initially given a set end date, will have to leave the country 30 days after their program’s completion. Thirty days is the new timeframe for F-1 nonimmigrants to prepare to depart from the United States after completion of a course of study or an authorized period of post-completion practical training. Previously, F-1 nonimmigrants had 60 days to prepare to depart from the United States.
- If current student visa holders leave the United States any time after September, they will be readmitted with a defined end date.
Pages 44977-44978 of the Preamble of the Final Rule state: “Replacing admissions for D/S with admissions for a fixed time period of authorized stay is consistent with most other nonimmigrant categories. It will provide additional protections and oversight of these nonimmigrant categories and will allow DHS to better evaluate whether these nonimmigrants are maintaining status while temporarily in the United States.”
FSA Releases Guidance on FVT/GE Data Reporting
On August 11, 2026, Federal Student Aid (FSA) released an Electronic Announcement (GENERAL-26-49), providing guidance on Financial Value Transparency and Gainful Employment (FVT/GE) data reporting requirements for both the prior and current reporting cycles, including the option to early implement the new Student Tuition and Transparency System (STATS) and Earnings Accountability data collection. The announcement also provides guidance about potential consequences for noncompliance, and ED’s intention to publish FVT/GE and STATS data in 2027.
The Department disclosed that more than 1,900 institutions have not reported or under-reported FVT/GE data from the 2024 and 2025 reporting cycles. These data sets were due September 30, 2025, and October 1, 2025, respectively. Institutions that have not yet reported all required FVT/GE data for the 2024 and 2025 reporting cycles are now considered delinquent and will have until January 15, 2027, to submit any unreported or under-reported FVT/GE data from the 2024 and 2025 reporting cycles. To assist institutions, FSA attached a spreadsheet to the announcement that shows which award years and specific FVT/GE data files each institution previously submitted and which files are missing.
Institutions were reminded that they must submit FVT/GE data for the 2026 reporting cycle by October 1, 2026. The announcement reminded institutions that they have the option not to report certain data elements in the FVT/GE collection. According to the final regulations of July 1, 2026, the Department will consider institutions that exclude one or more of the optional fields for the 2026 reporting cycle as an indication of their early implementation of the new reporting requirements in the STATS and Earnings Accountability rule. Early implementation of the reporting requirements in the STATS and Earnings Accountability rule has no effect on any other regulatory requirements. “It does not impact whether an institution is subject to the new earnings premium measure on and after July 1, 2027, nor does it impact the consequences of failing that measure.”
The Department is encouraging institutions to submit their FVT/GE data at least one week before the deadlines so that institutions have sufficient time to correct errors flagged in an institution’s submission. Institutions that fail to submit data for the 2024, 2025, or 2026 reporting cycles may receive fines, sanctions, or other actions ED deems appropriate for non-compliant institutions.
Finally, the announcement said that ED intends to publish data and statistics derived from the FVT/GE and STATS data in 2027. ED will publish draft data and statistics and allow institutions to review the information prior to those data being finalized. Later in the year, ED will publish final data and statistics derived from the FVT/GE and STATS data. ED will continue publishing draft and final data on an annual basis. Beginning in 2028, the annual data will be based solely on the STATS collection.
FSA Releases Frequently Asked Questions on Reducing Annual Loan Limits for Less-than-Full-Time Enrollment Using the Schedule of Reductions
Federal Student Aid (FSA) released “Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) for Reducing Annual Loan Limits for Less-than-Full-Time Enrollment Using the Schedule of Reductions” as of July 2026. This document states that it is intended to provide clarity regarding the new regulations that were published on May 1, 2026, and the interaction with existing requirements under the law or agency policies. The guidance’s contents “do not have the force and effect of law and are not meant to bind the public.”
The Schedule of Reductions (SOR) is a regulatory formula that proportionately reduces the annual amount a student may borrow when enrolled less than full-time during an academic year. The 24-question FAQs address many of the questions regarding the application of the final regulations. For instance, the FAQs address the steps that must be taken to determine that the borrower’s reduced loan eligibility when they enroll less than full-time in an academic year; what institutions should do if a borrower’s enrollment status changes after it made a loan disbursement; and how an institution can avoid “double-prorating” a loan when both existing loan limit proration rules and the new rules for reducing annual loan limits for less-than-full-time students apply.
ED Announces Approval of First Workforce Pell Grant Program in Iowa
On August 4, 2026, the Department of Education announced its approval of the first Workforce Pell Grant program for eligible students at Iowa Central Community College. Iowa Central Community College students can now use Pell Grants to enroll in the Emergency Medical Technician program, a 14-week program, that prepares students for public safety jobs.
Secretary of Education said: “After decades of debate and a lot of hard work, Workforce Pell is finally here – opening new opportunities for students to use their Pell Grants on programs that will help them jumpstart their careers.”
Secretary of Education Issues National Call to Action to University Presidents to Reaffirm Higher Education’s Commitments to Academic Excellence
On August 3, 2026, Secretary of Education Linda McMahon called on university presidents and governing boards, “urging them to reaffirm higher education’s foundational commitments to academic excellence, pathbreaking research, and national service.” Secretary McMahon urged every postsecondary institution to publish a clear public statement outlining its commitment to implementing reforms that help restore public trust in higher education. To this end, Secretary McMahon asked universities to begin a “forthright conversation with the American people” guided by seven questions:
- Transparency and Merit in Admissions;
- Free Speech and Open Inquiry;
- Intellectual Pluralism and Academic Vitality;
- Affordability, Value, and Student Outcomes;
- Academic Standards and Rigor in the Age of AI;
- Safeguarding Research Integrity from Malign Foreign Influence; and
- Prioritizing American Interests.
ED Releases Press Release Announcing the Trump Administration’s Efforts to Break Up the Federal Education Bureaucracy
On July 30, 2026, the Department of Education released a press release praising the “Trump Administration’s efforts to break up the federal education bureaucracy to cut through red tape, ensure efficient delivery of services, and empower local leaders to prioritize students.” The press release offered quotations from the Governor of Iowa Kim Reynolds, the American Resolve Institute, the Parents Defending Education, Visiting Fellow at The Heritage Foundation Adam Kissel, and the Pelican Institute.
Trump Administration Urges Congress to Support ED’s Interagency Agreements
On July 30, 2026, several members of the Trump Administration, including Secretary of Education Linda McMahon, Acting Secretary of Labor Keith Sonderling, Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent, and other cabinet leaders sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Senate Minority Leader Charles Schumer, Speaker of the House Mike Johnson, and Minority Leader of the House Hakeem Jeffries, urging their support of the administration’s efforts to dismantle the Department of Education through interagency agreements. “Since these agreements were signed, however, they have demonstrated measurable results by driving stronger grant competitions, streamlining government operations, and producing better outcomes for Americans.”
FSA Staff to Move to Treasury Office in August
According to a July 28, 2026, article in Inside Higher Ed, Federal Student Aid (FSA) and some of its staff are scheduled to move from their space in the Department of Education’s Lyndon B. Johnson Building on July 31, 2026. However, rather than move into the old USAID building, FSA will now transfer to a Department of Treasury building on K Street, NW, on August 17, 2026. Between the two moves, FSA staff will be working remotely. Other FSA offices will be moving to the former USAID building, although legislation approving the move requires Senate approval.
NACIQI Recommends that ED Deny NACCAS’s Renewal of Recognition
On July 22-23, 2026, the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI) met to review accrediting agencies’ renewal of recognition as nationally recognized accrediting agencies. NACIQI voted 9 to 3 that the Senior Department Official (SDO) deny renewal of recognition to the National Accrediting Commission of Career Arts and Sciences (NACCAS). The Department’s staff report had recommended renewal with conditions because their review found NACCAS not in compliance with 17 sections of the recognition criteria and substantially compliant with three other recognition criteria. [In a press release of July 22, 2026, NACCAS announced that it plans to challenge the NACIQI recommendation before a final decision is made by the Secretary of Education.]
The Department staff found the Council on Occupational Education (COE) to not be in compliance with 17 sections of the recognition criteria and substantially compliant with seven other recognition criteria. By a vote of 11 to 1, NACIQI recommended that the SDO accept the staff report’s recommendations to continue COE’s recognition as a nationally recognized accrediting agency with conditions.
In his opening statement at the NACIQI meeting, Under Secretary Nicholas Kent announced that three programmatic accrediting agencies have voluntarily withdrawn their petitions to continue their recognition because they did not want to be accountable to new standards. The Midwifery Education Accreditation Council (MEAC), the Council on Education for Public Health (CEPH), and the Council on Chiropractic Education (CCE) have all opted out. Only MEAC has operated in the role of Title IV gatekeeper, and it only evaluates eligibility for two of its 11 member institutions. Therefore, very few students and institutions will be impacted.
OIG Reveals the Impact of ED’s RIF
In June 2026, the Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) released a report, “Review of U.S. Department of Education, Changes in Staffing and Operations,” (F25DC0245) revealing the impact of the Trump Administration’s reduction in force (RIF) at the Department of Education. OIG noted that there was a scope limitation because the Department did not provide all requested information and “unfettered access” to Department staff.
OIG found that overall, the RIF resulted in staffing changes in 16 of the Department’s 17 offices. The result was a 40 percent decrease in the Department’s workforce by at least 1,579 of its 3,902 employees. Of those employees who left the Department, 1,227 employees were separated by RIF actions, and at least 352 employees voluntarily separated through other options.
With regard to Federal Student Aid (FSA) specifically, as of January 20, 2025, FSA had 1,446 employees with 136 suboffices. Seventy-two suboffices, consisting of 918 employees, were impacted by the RIF on March 11, 2025. From these 72 suboffices, 411 employees were separated through the RIF and another 174 separated through other options by March 11, 2025.
No remaining employees were found in the FSA suboffices performing the following functions:
- Overseeing guaranty agencies, lending institutions, and servicers participating in the Title IV loan programs.
- Administering a program of eligibility, certification, financial analysis, and oversight of schools participating in FSA programs. [A footnote notes that FSA had eight School Participation Divisions responsible for managing accountability in schools’ administration of the Federal student financial aid programs. Six of these divisions have no remaining employees. The remaining two are still performing this function.]
Some of the functions performed by the remaining FSA suboffices not directly impacted by the RIF are:
- Managing the Direct Loan program and the TEACH Grant origination and disbursement processes maintained on the COD system, including functionality available to FSA, schools, and servicers.
- Implementing the Secretary’s authority to fine, limit, suspend, and impose emergency actions against institutions of higher education, guaranty agencies, lenders, and servicers that participate in the Federal Title IV programs.
- Initiating administrative enforcement actions regarding a school’s eligibility under 34 C.F.R. § 668.13 (i.e., denial of certification, revocation of provisional Program Participation Agreements).
- Implementing the Secretary’s authority to initial debarment and suspension proceedings against individuals and other parties.
- Implementing the Secretary’s authority to resolve appeals of final audit and final program review determinations.
- Considering and issuing decisions on claims by individual borrowers who assert a defense to repayment of Federal student loans.
- Overseeing Campus Safety and Security Reporting by institutions of higher education participating in the Title IV programs.
- Developing, updating, and disseminating detailed and comprehensive guidance for the institutions of higher education participating in the Federal student financial aid programs.
FSA Releases Frequently Asked Questions on Real-Time FAFSA Fraud Detection
On July 17, 2026, Federal Student Aid (FSA) released an Electronic Announcement (APP-26-09) that provides Frequently Asked Questions on real-time FAFSA fraud detection and identity confirmation. FSA stated that the Department of Education is “committed to be a good school partner and to minimize administrative burden while protecting taxpayers, states, and institutions from bad actors seeking to misuse federal funds.”
Treasury Department Releases Alert on Federal Student Aid Fraud
On July 24, 2026, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), a bureau of the Department of the Treasury, published an alert, in consultation with the Department of Education’s Office of Inspector General (OIG) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), to urge financial institutions to be vigilant in detecting, identifying, and reporting suspicious activity connected to fraud schemes targeting Federal Student Aid (FSA) programs. Fraud rings use stolen and fraudulent identities, as well as other tactics, such as AI-powered chatbots, to enroll in educational institutions and unlawfully acquire funds from Federal student aid programs. While the schemes result in losses to Federal student aid programs, the students face difficulties enrolling in classes because of the number of fraudulently enrolled students. The Department has launched a nationwide effort to prevent fraud in Federal student aid programs, and in 2025, announced that it had prevented $1 billion in Federal student aid fraud during that calendar year.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Unanimously Rejected ED’s Appeal to Delay Student Loan Relief
On July 17, 2026, an article in “The College Investor” reported that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit unanimously rejected the Department of Education’s appeal to delay student loan relief for more than 170,000 borrowers under the Sweet v. McMahon borrower defense settlement, affirming the district court’s ruling that the deadline would not be extended. The judges found the Department failed to show the “changed circumstances” legally required to modify a settlement it agreed to in 2022. The ruling covers the group of “post-class applicants” who filed borrower defense claims between the settlement’s execution in June 2022 and its final approval in November 2022. The Department missed the deadlines to make a decision on those applications, and under the settlement terms, it owes relief to more than 170,000 of them.
D.C. Federal District Court Sets Schedule for Definition of “Professional Degree” Lawsuit
The Federal District Court for the District of Columbia overseeing the nurse practitioner (NP) and physician assistant (PA) lawsuit against the Department of Education, which challenges the Department’s definition of a “professional degree” under the Reimagining and Improving Student Education (RISE) final rule of May 1, 2026, has set a briefing schedule that will run through December 4, 2026. The parties of the lawsuit agreed to have the Court resolve this case by summary judgment, which means the judge makes a determination in the case without going to trial. The timeline means that the June 29, 2026 (Updated July 10, 2026) Electronic Announcement (GENERAL-26-42) issued by the Department, updating the list of professional degree programs eligible for higher unsubsidized loan limits, will likely remain in effect until a final decision is made by the judge.
Previously, the D.C. Federal District Court partially stayed the Department of Education’s definition of “professional degree” included in the RISE final rule, as well as the preamble requirement that professional degrees cannot “lead to employment that ordinarily must be supervised by a licensed professional in a different occupation and cannot be performed independently.” The final rule was scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2026. AANP v. McMahon is a consolidation of two suits brought in the D.C. Federal District Court, one brought by a coalition of membership associations, led by the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, and the other brought by two PA associations.
The judge granted the plaintiffs’ motions in part and stayed, under 5 U.S.C. § 705, part (i), which describes the four-part test of a professional degree, including being in the same four-digit program CIP code as one of the eleven listed programs. The judge denied the plaintiffs’ request to stay part (ii) of the definition. The part of the definition which remains in effect is: “A professional degree may be awarded in the following fields: Pharmacy (Pharm.D.), Dentistry (D.D.S. or D.M.D.), Veterinary Medicine (D.V.M.), Chiropractic (DC or DCM.), Law (L.L.B. or J.D.), Medicine (M.D.), Optometry (O.D.), Osteopathic Medicine (D.O.), Podiatry (D.P.M., D.P., or Pod.D.), Theology (M.Div., or M.H.L.), and Clinical Psychology (Psy.D. or Ph.D.).” The judge also indicated that the list of professional degree examples should continue to be treated as illustrative rather than exhaustive.
The judge did not suspend the statutory graduate and professional student loan limits enacted by Congress under the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) nor did he require the Department to classify additional programs as professional degree programs. The judge left to the Department the responsibility of determining which degrees count as “professional degrees” using only the criteria from the statutory definition provided by Congress. There is uncertainty right now how the Department will implement the remaining professional degree definition after the stay of part (i) and the preamble’s independent practice/supervision restriction.
NCAN Report Shows New Record in FAFSA Completers
According to a report on July 6, 2026, from the National College Attainment Network (NCAN), the high school class of 2026 set a new record in FAFSA completions, with 59.1 percent of graduating seniors completing the FAFSA by June 30, 2026. The class of 2025 had a FAFSA completion rate of 53.9 percent by June 30, 2025. In 2024, high school seniors had a FAFSA completion rate of 47.3 percent by June 30, 2024.
NCAN CEO Kim Cook said: “The increase in students completing the FAFSA, shows that students deeply value college, and respond positively when we make it easier for them to get help paying for their education.”
Sharon H. Bob, Ph.D.
Higher Education Specialist
Powers Pyles Sutter and Verville, PC
1250 Connecticut Avenue, NW, Eighth Floor
Washington, DC 20036
T: 202-872-6772
F: 202-792-6540